On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:13:57AM -0700, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 20 September 2015 at 22:34, Jonathan Neuschäfer > <j.neuschae...@gmx.net> wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 3 September 2015 at 06:27, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschae...@gmx.net> > >> wrote: > >> > Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from > >> > target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through > >> > subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64, > >> > because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest > >> > address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of > >> > target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr. > >> > > >> > I found and fixed two more related bugs: > >> > - __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the > >> > old one. > >> > - tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct > >> > target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore. > >> > > >> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschae...@gmx.net> > >> > >> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> > > > > Ping. > > > > What's the status of this patch? > It's waiting for Riku to wake up and put it into a linux-user > pull request.
My intention was to gather a pull request before this travel, but alas I was stuck with other stuff. I'll get it done next week latest. Riku
