On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi > > On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 11:25 PM, Peter Crosthwaite > <crosthwaitepe...@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 4, 2015 at 2:01 PM, <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> From: Marc-André Lureau <marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> >>> >>> It looks like this documentation is obsolete: a child object may lookup >>> its parent stored in the Object struct. >>> >> >> Using a function wrapper or direct access to Object structure field? > > By direct access to the struct field. > >> >> The latter would indicate they are workarounds. Which legit uses of >> parent identification are you referring to? > > I am not saying this is legit or not to use this field, it's just > wrong documentation to me: the relationship is bidirectionnal. That's > one of the few differences with the link<> properties. >
It is biderctional for the implementation but not for the QOM API. I think the comment is correct as long as there is no exposed API to do this. Regards, Peter > regards > > -- > Marc-André Lureau
