Hello!

> It's not clear to me that the TCG version of GICv3
> emulation should need to have such a link.

 How can it be done otherwise? Should GIC code somehow register own system 
register handlers instead?

> The original
> emulation patchset was definitely not handling the
> GIC-to-CPU connection in the right way

 But it seems to be very convenient to reuse what already exists, isn't it? I 
remember that your main concern was about poking directly into ARMCPU 
structure, and i remember that one of us at least said the word "property". So, 
what is fundamentally bad here?
 Well, if you just don't want, then you don't want, i'm fine with this. My 
arguments end here.

Kind regards,
Pavel Fedin
Expert Engineer
Samsung Electronics Research center Russia



Reply via email to