Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> writes: > On 27/01/2015 17:13, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Note: checkpatch is unhappy with the first patch, because I refrained >> from cleaning up the ugly return(NULL). They're all over the place. >> >> Markus Armbruster (3): >> util/uri: uri_new() can't fail, drop dead error handling >> util/uri: realloc2n() can't fail, drop dead error handling >> util/uri: URI member path can be null, compare more carfully >> >> util/uri.c | 61 >> +++++++++++++------------------------------------------------ >> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-) >> > > Patches 1-2 okay. For patch 3 a very similar patch was posted yesterday.
Missed it until now. Yes, it's functionally identical. Dear -trivial maintainer, pick whichever you like better :)
