On 10 December 2014 at 23:25, Maciej W. Rozycki <ma...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> > Except that apart from coming to an agreement someone has to make it >> > happen yet. ;) >> >> Ah, but I'm happy with the current state of the codebase... > > Ack.
To clarify, that was a slightly tongue-in-cheek response, but I do actually feel strongly enough that we shouldn't create new wrong executables that I'd rather we left the bugs here unaddressed than try to fix them with a lot of new softmmu executables. >> Er, I'm not sure what you mean there. Trying a softmmu config for >> mipsn32 or mipsn32el fails gracefully already: >> >> manooth$ (cd build/mips && ../../configure --target-list=mipsn32-softmmu) >> >> ERROR: Unknown target name 'mipsn32-softmmu' > > It looks like the issue I had in mind has been fixed in a generic way > then since I last checked. Previously a build error happened sometime > along the process. Apologies for not double-checking with current trunk. > I'll send updates. Yes, we fixed configure to sanity check user target-list arguments some time last year. Note that the list of valid targets is driven by looking at what files exist in default-configs/, so you'll want to delete any stale or local files you have there from previous versions of this patchset. thanks -- PMM
