On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Peter Maydell wrote: > > Except that apart from coming to an agreement someone has to make it > > happen yet. ;) > > Ah, but I'm happy with the current state of the codebase...
Ack. > > Fair enough, I want to move forward though. Would it make you happy if I > > dropped the new -softmmu configs and made mipsn32|mipsn32el and > > mipsn64|mipsn64el only accept -user configs instead (failing gracefully > > rather than abruptly as mipsn32|mipsn32el do now)? > > Er, I'm not sure what you mean there. Trying a softmmu config for > mipsn32 or mipsn32el fails gracefully already: > > manooth$ (cd build/mips && ../../configure --target-list=mipsn32-softmmu) > > ERROR: Unknown target name 'mipsn32-softmmu' It looks like the issue I had in mind has been fixed in a generic way then since I last checked. Previously a build error happened sometime along the process. Apologies for not double-checking with current trunk. I'll send updates. Maciej
