On 2014-11-10 at 17:59, Max Reitz wrote:
This is technically a v2 to
"block: Fix filename generation for blkdebug and nbd" which contained a
fix for the NBD filename generation, which has been merged into master
by now. The rest, however, has not been yet, due to lack of reviews.
Instead of pinging an old series with an already merged patch I'm
therefore just resending the remaining two patches with this nice
inciting cover letter which really, really makes you want to review the
patches because they are so lovely. I don't want to say good, because I
know my patches, but you want to review them either way because you
can't stand the excitement to know what's in them.
There is only one way of ever finding out: Review them! It'll bring
great joy and maybe even glory!
Also, if you don't review them and I have to send a v3, I'll attach a
picture of a really cute kitten and tell you that this kitten will cry
really badly if you don't adopt these patches. After another month, I
will send a picture of a crying kitten.
So you better review this version.
git-backport-diff against v1:
Key:
[----] : patches are identical
[####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
[down] : patch is downstream-only
The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively
001/2:[----] [--] 'blkdebug: Simplify and improve filename generation'
002/2:[----] [--] 'iotests: Plain blkdebug filename generation'
Max Reitz (2):
blkdebug: Simplify and improve filename generation
iotests: Plain blkdebug filename generation
block/blkdebug.c | 98 +++++++++++++---------------------------------
tests/qemu-iotests/099 | 9 ++++-
tests/qemu-iotests/099.out | 8 +++-
3 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 74 deletions(-)
Oops, forgot to CC Peter. I bet he can't resist yet non-existing cute
kittens.
Max
