On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Leon Alrae wrote: > > I have been working with the current trunk, the change applies > > correctly there AFAICT. > > 55a2201 commit added (1 << CP0C3_MSAP) to CP0_Config3 for > mips32r5-generic which is not present on your patch.
Indeed, my mistake for some reason. > > I have no objections to changing mips32r5-generic, it is artificial > > anyway. But what do you mean by DSP and MSA on one CPU having no sense, > > is there a conflict between the two ASEs? > > I was considering making mips32r5-generic less artificial and slowly > evolve it towards some existing MIPS32R5 CPU, for example P5600 (which > supports MSA, but doesn't support DSP ASE). Furthermore, none from the > latest MIPS CPUs supports both ASEs. Why not leave mips32r5-generic alone then and add a correct entry for the P5600 instead? Maciej
