On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Leon Alrae wrote: > When I've been applying this patch to my mips-next candidate branch for > 2.2 I realized that you haven't rebased it onto the recent version where > MSA has been added to mips32r5-generic. Now I don't think that having > DSP and MSA on one CPU makes sense, therefore what I'm going to do is to > change mips32r5-generic part in your patch slightly: instead of setting > CP0.Config3.DSP/DSP2P the patch will remove ASE_DSP/DSPR2 insn_flags.
I have been working with the current trunk, the change applies correctly there AFAICT. I have no objections to changing mips32r5-generic, it is artificial anyway. But what do you mean by DSP and MSA on one CPU having no sense, is there a conflict between the two ASEs? Maciej
