On Tue, 06 May 2014 08:55:52 -0600 Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Eventually, we might want to have if/defs and whatnot. But having a master > > file seems a reasonable first step to me. I actually thought this was the > > intention. Unless I got it wrong, of course. > > Ifdefs may be a bit much. If we add them, then we can worry about > explicit include guards, the same as the C preprocessor. But for now, > I'd be perfectly fine with a followup patch that includes a file's > contents exactly once, no matter how many times it is included (that is, > act as if include guards were implicitly present, since we lack > conditionals, so include files are currently idempotent). OK. Does it make sense to merge the current series without that modification?
