Ping, I am aware that this patch must be a QObject/CPUState monstruosity but I don't see how I could store the fact that the cpu derive from a "host" type cpu. The alternative would be to remember a variable number of leaves and serving them to the guest as needed but I don't find that much cleaner.
Best regards Benoît > Le Tuesday 27 Aug 2013 à 22:38:25 (+0200), Benoît Canet a écrit : > This patch uses directly cpuid_host to forward the informations instead of > storing a variable number of leaves in the cpu states. > > Benoît Canet (1): > i386: forward CPUID cache leaves when -cpu host is used > > target-i386/cpu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > target-i386/cpu.h | 1 + > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) > > -- > 1.7.10.4 >
