On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 02:45:48PM +0200, Benoît Canet wrote: > > Ping, > > I am aware that this patch must be a QObject/CPUState monstruosity but I don't > see how I could store the fact that the cpu derive from a "host" type cpu. > The alternative would be to remember a variable number of leaves and serving > them to the guest as needed but I don't find that much cleaner.
The idea makes sense for -cpu host, and it is not intrusive for all other CPU models. I just didn't take the time to look at the code to send my "reviewed-by:" line yet. I plan to take a look today or tomorrow. > > Best regards > > Benoît > > > Le Tuesday 27 Aug 2013 à 22:38:25 (+0200), Benoît Canet a écrit : > > This patch uses directly cpuid_host to forward the informations instead of > > storing a variable number of leaves in the cpu states. > > > > Benoît Canet (1): > > i386: forward CPUID cache leaves when -cpu host is used > > > > target-i386/cpu.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++ > > target-i386/cpu.h | 1 + > > 2 files changed, 20 insertions(+) > > > > -- > > 1.7.10.4 > > -- Eduardo
