Am 29.07.2013 um 15:47 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> Il 29/07/2013 15:13, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
> > Am 25.07.2013 um 16:23 hat Paolo Bonzini geschrieben:
> >> If a BlockDriverState is growable, after every write we need to
> >> check if bs->total_sectors might have changed.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com>
> >> ---
> >> block.c | 3 +++
> >> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/block.c b/block.c
> >> index 6cd39fa..ebac2fa 100644
> >> --- a/block.c
> >> +++ b/block.c
> >> @@ -2651,6 +2651,9 @@ static int coroutine_fn
> >> bdrv_co_do_writev(BlockDriverState *bs,
> >> if (bs->wr_highest_sector < sector_num + nb_sectors - 1) {
> >> bs->wr_highest_sector = sector_num + nb_sectors - 1;
> >> }
> >> + if (bs->growable && ret >= 0) {
> >> + bs->total_sectors = MAX(bs->total_sectors, sector_num +
> >> nb_sectors);
> >> + }
> >
> > Can we change bdrv_getlength() to use bs->total_sectors even for
> > growable images after this patch?
>
> Probably, but not in 1.6. :)
"Probably" was my conclusion as well. The answer to this question is the
answer to whether this patch makes sense, I think. So I can give you a
Probably-reviewed-by if that's of any use. ;-)
FWIW, I've got the feeling that the whole series might be better suited
for block-next. Is there anything urgent in it?
Kevin
