On Sat, Apr 6, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 3 April 2013 05:32, Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> wrote: >> QSPI has a bigger FIFO than the regular SPI controller. Differentiate >> between the two with correct FIFO sizes for each. >> >> Signed-off-by: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwa...@xilinx.com> >> --- >> >> hw/xilinx_spips.c | 7 +++++++ >> 1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/hw/xilinx_spips.c b/hw/xilinx_spips.c >> index 06c2ec5..78a3fec 100644 >> --- a/hw/xilinx_spips.c >> +++ b/hw/xilinx_spips.c >> @@ -106,6 +106,9 @@ >> #define RXFF_A 32 >> #define TXFF_A 32 >> >> +#define RXFF_A_Q (64 * 4) >> +#define TXFF_A_Q (64 * 4) >> + >> /* 16MB per linear region */ >> #define LQSPI_ADDRESS_BITS 24 >> /* Bite off 4k chunks at a time */ >> @@ -575,6 +578,10 @@ static void xilinx_qspips_realize(DeviceState *dev, >> Error **errp) >> s->num_txrx_bytes = 4; >> >> xilinx_spips_realize(dev, errp); >> + fifo8_destroy(&s->rx_fifo); >> + fifo8_destroy(&s->tx_fifo); >> + fifo8_create(&s->rx_fifo, RXFF_A_Q); >> + fifo8_create(&s->tx_fifo, TXFF_A_Q); >> memory_region_init_io(&s->mmlqspi, &lqspi_ops, s, "lqspi", >> (1 << LQSPI_ADDRESS_BITS) * 2); >> sysbus_init_mmio(sbd, &s->mmlqspi); > > Destroying and recreating the fifos seems a bit odd -- can you > structure this so the base class instance init just creates them > at the right size? I guess the obvious way would be to have the > class struct have a field for fifo size which the class init > function sets appropriately, and then instance init creates > a fifo of that size.
Done. Regards, Peter >This is kind of like how target-arm/cpu.c > handles ID register fields, but in the class rather than the > instance struct. > > -- PMM >
