On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:03:53 +0200
Andreas Färber <afaer...@suse.de> wrote:
> Am 21.03.2013 15:28, schrieb Igor Mammedov:
> > ... and define type name and type cast macro for kvmvapic according
> > to accepted convention.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
>
> This looks great and a cherry-pick candidate if you agree?
Np, BTW I have a second similar clean-up in v2 for IOAPIC
>
> Just wondering, was there a name conflict for shorter VAPIC()?
> It's file-local, so doesn't really matter.
Nope, I just followed *_DEVICE model like for SYS_BUS_DEVICE()
>
> Andreas
>
> > ---
> > hw/i386/kvmvapic.c | 7 +++++--
> > 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> > index c151c95..21551a5 100644
> > --- a/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> > +++ b/hw/i386/kvmvapic.c
> > @@ -62,6 +62,9 @@ typedef struct VAPICROMState {
> > bool rom_mapped_writable;
> > } VAPICROMState;
> >
> > +#define TYPE_VAPIC_DEVICE "kvmvapic"
> > +#define VAPIC_DEVICE(obj) OBJECT_CHECK(VAPICROMState, (obj),
> > TYPE_VAPIC_DEVICE)
> > +
> > #define TPR_INSTR_ABS_MODRM 0x1
> > #define TPR_INSTR_MATCH_MODRM_REG 0x2
> >
> > @@ -692,7 +695,7 @@ static const MemoryRegionOps vapic_ops = {
> >
> > static int vapic_init(SysBusDevice *dev)
> > {
> > - VAPICROMState *s = FROM_SYSBUS(VAPICROMState, dev);
> > + VAPICROMState *s = VAPIC_DEVICE(dev);
> >
> > memory_region_init_io(&s->io, &vapic_ops, s, "kvmvapic", 2);
> > sysbus_add_io(dev, VAPIC_IO_PORT, &s->io);
> > @@ -808,7 +811,7 @@ static void vapic_class_init(ObjectClass *klass, void
> > *data)
> > }
> >
> > static const TypeInfo vapic_type = {
> > - .name = "kvmvapic",
> > + .name = TYPE_VAPIC_DEVICE,
> > .parent = TYPE_SYS_BUS_DEVICE,
> > .instance_size = sizeof(VAPICROMState),
> > .class_init = vapic_class_init,
> >
>
>
> --
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg, Germany
> GF: Jeff Hawn, Jennifer Guild, Felix Imendörffer; HRB 16746 AG Nürnberg
>
--
Regards,
Igor
