Il 15/01/2013 14:18, Kevin Wolf ha scritto: >> > Brad and Peter, >> > >> > as far as I know OpenBSD and Linux/ARM were the main users of >> > coroutine-gthread. Do you think we could dump it and rely on >> > coroutine-sigaltstack only? The differences in signal handling of the >> > gthread implementation always worried me. >> > >> > What versions of OpenBSD would we have to drop support for? Is that >> > acceptable to you? > Changing the defaults for these platforms may be a good idea, but I > actually like the option of having coroutine-gthread because it's much > friendlier to debug - gdb supports threads, but not coroutines. > > Is coroutine-gthread blocking anything or is it just that you're not > entirely confident in its correctness?
I'm not entirely confident in its correctness, and I'd be afraid of breaking things when converting dataplane to AIOContext. Paolo
