On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 07:24:35PM +0100, Andreas F?rber wrote: > Am 11.01.2013 19:11, schrieb Paolo Bonzini: > > Brad and Peter, > > > > as far as I know OpenBSD and Linux/ARM were the main users of > > coroutine-gthread. Do you think we could dump it and rely on > > coroutine-sigaltstack only? The differences in signal handling of the > > gthread implementation always worried me. > > > > What versions of OpenBSD would we have to drop support for? Is that > > acceptable to you? > > No, I believe there is explicit code in configure to force the GThread > implementation on Mac OS X.
That is to skip over testing for the ucontext implementation. There was a build issue with the sigaltstack implementation but it was fixed relatively recently. -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean.
