Am 11.01.2013 19:11, schrieb Paolo Bonzini:
> Brad and Peter,
> 
> as far as I know OpenBSD and Linux/ARM were the main users of
> coroutine-gthread.  Do you think we could dump it and rely on
> coroutine-sigaltstack only?  The differences in signal handling of the
> gthread implementation always worried me.
> 
> What versions of OpenBSD would we have to drop support for?  Is that
> acceptable to you?

Changing the defaults for these platforms may be a good idea, but I
actually like the option of having coroutine-gthread because it's much
friendlier to debug - gdb supports threads, but not coroutines.

Is coroutine-gthread blocking anything or is it just that you're not
entirely confident in its correctness?

Kevin

Reply via email to