Hi, > So while I am impartial to this specific patch, some easy way to run a > comprehensive test coverage without having to manually name each test > using --tests= would be very handy! Something like --all-tests maybe?
Hint from the dirty tricks department: --tests=JeOS will do (for --type=kvm). Not sure how useful that actually is though, not all tests are in a good and tested state. HTH, Gerd
