Thanks, applied.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:35 PM, Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> wrote:
> Am 27.07.2012 19:00, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>> Am 12.06.2012 10:24, schrieb Andreas Färber:
>>> Am 29.05.2012 15:35, schrieb Stefano Stabellini:
>>>> qemu_rearm_alarm_timer partially duplicates the code in
>>>> qemu_next_alarm_deadline to figure out if it needs to rearm the timer.
>>>> If it calls qemu_next_alarm_deadline, it always rearms the timer even if
>>>> the next deadline is INT64_MAX.
>>>>
>>>> This patch simplifies the behavior of qemu_rearm_alarm_timer and removes
>>>> the duplicated code, always calling qemu_next_alarm_deadline and only
>>>> rearming the timer if the deadline is less than INT64_MAX.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com>
>>>
>>> Tested-by: Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de>
>>
>> Ping! Can the patch please be applied? Note: Patchwork apparently got
>> confused by the later follow-up inline patches - only the original patch
>> is needed.
>
> Ping^2! This didn't make it into 1.1, would be nice to have 1.2 working.
>
> Correct Patchwork link is: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/161749/
>
> /-F
>
>>
>> Also cc'ing qemu-stable for stable-1.1.
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>
