Am 12.06.2012 10:24, schrieb Andreas Färber: > Am 29.05.2012 15:35, schrieb Stefano Stabellini: >> qemu_rearm_alarm_timer partially duplicates the code in >> qemu_next_alarm_deadline to figure out if it needs to rearm the timer. >> If it calls qemu_next_alarm_deadline, it always rearms the timer even if >> the next deadline is INT64_MAX. >> >> This patch simplifies the behavior of qemu_rearm_alarm_timer and removes >> the duplicated code, always calling qemu_next_alarm_deadline and only >> rearming the timer if the deadline is less than INT64_MAX. >> >> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> > > Tested-by: Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de>
Ping! Can the patch please be applied? Note: Patchwork apparently got confused by the later follow-up inline patches - only the original patch is needed. Also cc'ing qemu-stable for stable-1.1. Andreas
