Am 27.07.2012 19:00, schrieb Andreas Färber: > Am 12.06.2012 10:24, schrieb Andreas Färber: >> Am 29.05.2012 15:35, schrieb Stefano Stabellini: >>> qemu_rearm_alarm_timer partially duplicates the code in >>> qemu_next_alarm_deadline to figure out if it needs to rearm the timer. >>> If it calls qemu_next_alarm_deadline, it always rearms the timer even if >>> the next deadline is INT64_MAX. >>> >>> This patch simplifies the behavior of qemu_rearm_alarm_timer and removes >>> the duplicated code, always calling qemu_next_alarm_deadline and only >>> rearming the timer if the deadline is less than INT64_MAX. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com> >> >> Tested-by: Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de> > > Ping! Can the patch please be applied? Note: Patchwork apparently got > confused by the later follow-up inline patches - only the original patch > is needed.
Ping^2! This didn't make it into 1.1, would be nice to have 1.2 working. Correct Patchwork link is: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/161749/ /-F > > Also cc'ing qemu-stable for stable-1.1. > > Andreas >
