Hi Cédric & Daniel, On 2025/6/16 3:55 AM, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
On 6/16/25 09:47, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:On Mon, Jun 16, 2025 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:On 6/16/25 09:13, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:On Sat, Jun 14, 2025 at 07:29:09AM +0200, Cédric Le Goater wrote:Hello Sean,On 6/13/25 18:44, Sean Wei wrote:Some of the GPLv2 boiler-plate still contained the obsolete "51 Franklin Street" postal address.Replace it with the canonical GNU licenses URL recommended by the FSF:https://www.gnu.org/licenses/ Signed-off-by: Sean Wei <me@sean.taipei>Instead, I would remove the license boiler plate and add : SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-or-laterThis is *NOT* something we are doing for existing code sources, unless the person removing it is the exclusive copyright holder on the file.Ah. So I misunderstood. How is license boiler plate different from the SPDX identifier tag ?It achieves the same aims, but notice GPL clause 1 "keep intact all the notices that refer to this License and to the absence of any warranty;" and yes, some projects have none the less done a wholesale replacement of boilerplate. I don't know how they rationalized ignoring this license requirement. It is simpler to just preserve boilerplate as-is that to debate the legal nuances of this.OK. Then, let's forget about this replacement. Thanks, C.
Thank you both for the clarification! To avoid any controversy, I will keep the patch in its original form, only replacing the deprecated FSF address with the canonical GNU licenses URL.
Cédric, could you please take another look and let me know if everything looks good? If so, I'd be grateful if you could add a Reviewed-by tag. Thanks!
All the best, Sean Wei
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature