Il 23/04/2012 21:38, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 21:36:39 +0200 > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Il 23/04/2012 20:04, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: >>> The optional parameter is fine for me too, but we recently had a >>> discussion where it was decided that we should add new commands instead >>> of extending existing ones. >>> >>> Anthony, I believe we're already taking that position, right? >> >> This command was never in a released version. > > Then why does the argument has to be optional?
Because "don't pass the argument" is a better UI than "0" for "no speed limit". Paolo
