On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 18:40:25 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 10/04/2012 16:30, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > > On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:27:43 +0200 > > Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > >> Il 10/04/2012 16:23, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > >>>>> Regarding device_add ? and device_add foo,? I would implement it as > >>>>> separate QMP commands hooking into QOM, such as qom_list_types (taking > >>>>> the superclass as an optional argument) and qom_properties. But the > >>>>> latter first needs static properties to move up from devices to objects. > >>>>> I'll take a look at that. > >>> Have you? > >> > >> Yes, patches were on the list. I'll submit v2 tomorrow or thursday. > > > > Great. > > > >>> I think that for device_add foo,? we could introduce > >>> qom-list-type-properties. > >>> Seems simple if limited to devices, not sure how to make it generic > >>> though. > >> > >> With those patches you can make it generic. > > > > Cool, what about device_add ?, any recommendations? > > That's easier, you can just list non-abstract types with TYPE_DEVICE > superclass (note that's a macro). By using qom-list-types? The problem is how to export fields like 'no_user' in QMP.
