On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:27:43 +0200 Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Il 10/04/2012 16:23, Luiz Capitulino ha scritto: > >> > Regarding device_add ? and device_add foo,? I would implement it as > >> > separate QMP commands hooking into QOM, such as qom_list_types (taking > >> > the superclass as an optional argument) and qom_properties. But the > >> > latter first needs static properties to move up from devices to objects. > >> > I'll take a look at that. > > Have you? > > Yes, patches were on the list. I'll submit v2 tomorrow or thursday. Great. > > I think that for device_add foo,? we could introduce > > qom-list-type-properties. > > Seems simple if limited to devices, not sure how to make it generic though. > > With those patches you can make it generic. Cool, what about device_add ?, any recommendations?
