On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 4:32 PM Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 13, 2024 at 01:55:50PM +1000, Alistair Francis wrote:
> > On Tue, May 7, 2024 at 3:24 PM Sia Jee Heng
> > <jeeheng....@starfivetech.com> wrote:
> >
> > Can you describe why you are doing this and that it will be reverted
> > in the commit message?
> >
> > Alistair
>
> What motivation are you asking? This follows the normal acpi test update
> procedure.

I find it clearer to have commits describe that they are disabling
tests for a specific reason. That way it's easier to track what's
going on.

If ACPI test updates don't usually do that then that's fine with me

Alistair

>
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Sia Jee Heng <jeeheng....@starfivetech.com>
> > > ---
> > >  tests/qtest/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h | 2 ++
> > >  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h 
> > > b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h
> > > index dfb8523c8b..3f12ca546b 100644
> > > --- a/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h
> > > +++ b/tests/qtest/bios-tables-test-allowed-diff.h
> > > @@ -1 +1,3 @@
> > >  /* List of comma-separated changed AML files to ignore */
> > > +"tests/data/acpi/virt/riscv64/SPCR",
> > > +"tests/data/acpi/virt/aarch64/SPCR",
> > > --
> > > 2.34.1
> > >
> > >
>

Reply via email to