Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> writes: > Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> writes: > >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 1:43 AM Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >>> >>> Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> writes: >>> >>> > From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> >>> > >>> > It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for >>> > error. In fact, the validation is even more complex. >>> > >>> > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> >>> > Acked-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_...@linux.alibaba.com> >>> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com> >>> > Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> >>> > Message-Id: <20231213-riscv-v7-2-a760156a3...@daynix.com> >>> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> >>> >>> ping: along with this are the RiscV maintainers happy for me to take: >>> >>> [PATCH v2 23/43] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation >>> [PATCH v2 24/43] target/riscv: Move misa_mxl_max to class >>> [PATCH v2 25/43] target/riscv: Validate misa_mxl_max only once >>> >>> through my next pull request? >> >> Yep! Go for it > > Sadly some of the recent changes that went through have created a merge > conflict. > > Akihiko, > > Any chance you could re-spin just the MISA_MXL patches?
Never mind, I think I got it figured out. -- Alex Bennée Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
