Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> writes:

> From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
>
> It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for
> error. In fact, the validation is even more complex.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com>
> Acked-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_...@linux.alibaba.com>
> Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com>
> Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com>
> Message-Id: <20231213-riscv-v7-2-a760156a3...@daynix.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org>

ping: along with this are the RiscV maintainers happy for me to take:

  [PATCH v2 23/43] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation
  [PATCH v2 24/43] target/riscv: Move misa_mxl_max to class
  [PATCH v2 25/43] target/riscv: Validate misa_mxl_max only once

through my next pull request?

<snip>

-- 
Alex Bennée
Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro

Reply via email to