Alistair Francis <alistai...@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Jan 9, 2024 at 1:43 AM Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> wrote: >> >> Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> writes: >> >> > From: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> >> > >> > It is initialized with a simple assignment and there is little room for >> > error. In fact, the validation is even more complex. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Akihiko Odaki <akihiko.od...@daynix.com> >> > Acked-by: LIU Zhiwei <zhiwei_...@linux.alibaba.com> >> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Henrique Barboza <dbarb...@ventanamicro.com> >> > Acked-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.fran...@wdc.com> >> > Message-Id: <20231213-riscv-v7-2-a760156a3...@daynix.com> >> > Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> >> >> ping: along with this are the RiscV maintainers happy for me to take: >> >> [PATCH v2 23/43] target/riscv: Remove misa_mxl validation >> [PATCH v2 24/43] target/riscv: Move misa_mxl_max to class >> [PATCH v2 25/43] target/riscv: Validate misa_mxl_max only once >> >> through my next pull request? > > Yep! Go for it
Sadly some of the recent changes that went through have created a merge conflict. Akihiko, Any chance you could re-spin just the MISA_MXL patches? > > Alistair > >> >> <snip> >> >> -- >> Alex Bennée >> Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro >> -- Alex Bennée Virtualisation Tech Lead @ Linaro
