Is this patch okay? The first version had some comments, and now the v2 has been a bit too silent, not sure if that's a good sign or a bad sign.
Thanks & sorry! On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 12:25, Alex Barcelo <abarc...@ac.upc.edu> wrote: > This series of patches implements coroutines method with > sigaltstack. > > The flow of creation and management of the coroutines is > quite similar to the coroutine-ucontext.c. The way to use > sigaltstack to achieve the needed stack manipulation is > done in a way quite similar to the GNU Portable Threads > (file pth_mctx.c, variant 2). > > This v2 has some corrections and improved patches, but it's > essentially the same. At the moment, the default backend is > ucontext (the former default method for coroutines). > > Alex Barcelo (3): > coroutine: adding sigaltstack method (.c source) > coroutine: adding configure choose mechanism for coroutine backend > coroutine: adding configure option for sigaltstack coroutine backend > > Makefile.objs | 4 + > configure | 41 +++++- > coroutine-sigaltstack.c | 334 > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 371 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 coroutine-sigaltstack.c > > -- > 1.7.5.4 >
