On Sat, 2005-05-14 at 14:16 +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote: ... > 2) The first implementation would use a cycle counter to schedule > between CPUs. Is it interesting to go further and to use a host thread > for each guest CPU at the expense of more locking overhead ?
What inter processor synchronization issues are there? Could you take this a step further and use processes on different machines for each processor? (There are many shared memory implementations to choose from.) I have ignorantly implemented an SH2 emulator, but have zero understanding of an SMP system. Are there so many resources shared between the CPUs to make this a ridiculous proposition? It could make for a interesting distributed single image system. -- Joe Batt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Qemu-devel mailing list Qemu-devel@nongnu.org http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
