On Fri, 12 Nov 2021 at 13:34, Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: > > > On 03/11/2021 09.41, Markus Armbruster wrote: > >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: > >> > >>> Does it make sense for a device/board to do drive_get_next(IF_NONE) ? > >> Short answer: hell, no! ;) > > > > Would it make sense to add an "assert(type != IF_NONE)" to drive_get() > > to avoid such mistakes in the future? > > Worth a try.
You need to fix the sifive_u_otp device first :-) -- PMM
