On 03/11/2021 09.41, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes:

Does it make sense for a device/board to do drive_get_next(IF_NONE) ?

Short answer: hell, no!  ;)

Would it make sense to add an "assert(type != IF_NONE)" to drive_get() to avoid such mistakes in the future?

 Thomas


Reply via email to