Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> writes: > On 03/11/2021 09.41, Markus Armbruster wrote: >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> writes: >> >>> Does it make sense for a device/board to do drive_get_next(IF_NONE) ? >> Short answer: hell, no! ;) > > Would it make sense to add an "assert(type != IF_NONE)" to drive_get() > to avoid such mistakes in the future?
Worth a try.
