Gerrit Holl wrote: > True. However, most mail to this mailinglist has less than 0.001 spam > probability. As you can see, this one had 0.048 - a vast score, almost > enough to put it in my unsure box. It seems to be just not hammy enough. > It's interesting to see that no none of the foul language words used by > Xah Lee ever occurs in any spam I receive - spam is not that stupid.
"Xah Lee: stupider than spam." (?) -neologism-intentional-ly y'rs, Peter -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
