Steve Holden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [off-list] > > Peter Hansen wrote: >> Gerrit Holl wrote: >> >>>True. However, most mail to this mailinglist has less than 0.001 spam >>>probability. As you can see, this one had 0.048 - a vast score, almost >>>enough to put it in my unsure box. It seems to be just not hammy enough. >>>It's interesting to see that no none of the foul language words used by >>>Xah Lee ever occurs in any spam I receive - spam is not that stupid. >> "Xah Lee: stupider than spam." (?) >> -neologism-intentional-ly y'rs, >> Peter > I'm responding off-list so's not to give this loony's threads any more > visibility.
You seem to have goofed. > FWIW I really like the slogan. Maybe you should register > "stupiderthanspam.com" and make a million? Amused me no end. I smell a google bomb. Add the link "<a href="http://xahlee.org/";>stupider than spam</a>" to your favorite web page, and in a while typing "stupider than spam" into google and hitting "I feel lucky" will take you to Xah Lee's home page.... <mike -- Mike Meyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.mired.org/home/mwm/ Independent WWW/Perforce/FreeBSD/Unix consultant, email for more information. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
