On 9/13/2021 8:46 AM, Mostowski Collapse wrote:
The Standard Python version of Dogelog runtime
is annoyingly slow. So we gave it a try with
andother Python, and it was 6x times faster.
We could test GraalVM. We worked around the missing
match in Python 3.8 by replacing it with if-then-else.
Performance is a little better, we find:
/* Standard Python Version, Warm Run */
?- time(fibo(23,X)).
% Wall 3865 ms, gc 94 ms, 71991 lips
X = 46368.
/* GraalVM Python Version, Warm Warm Run */
?- time(fibo(23,X)).
% Wall 695 ms, gc 14 ms, 400356 lips
X = 46368.
See also:
JDK 1.8 GraalVM Python is 6x faster than Standard Python
https://twitter.com/dogelogch/status/1437395917167112193
JDK 1.8 GraalVM Python is 6x faster than Standard Python
https://www.facebook.com/groups/dogelog
You need to test more than fibonacci to make that claim. There is a
benchmark test that times around 40 different similarly small benchmarks.
--
Terry Jan Reedy
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
