Hi,
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 11:47 AM Mr Flibble <
flib...@i42.invalidwibblegrok.co.uk> wrote:
> On 05/05/2021 17:36, Igor Korot wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 11:27 AM Mr Flibble <
> > flib...@i42.invalidwibblegrok.co.uk> wrote:
> >
> >> On 05/05/2021 17:02, Chris Angelico wrote:
> >>> On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 2:01 AM Mr Flibble
> >>> <flib...@i42.invalidwibblegrok.co.uk> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> neoPython : Fastest Python Implementation: Coming Soon
> >>>>
> >>>> Message ends.
> >>>>
> >>>> /Flibble
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> My breath: not being held.
> >>>
> >>> Message ends.
> >>
> >> Why? The currently extant Python implementations are so inefficient they
> >> contribute to climate change; CPython is particularly egregious. Making
> a
> >> faster
> >> implementation isn't in the least bit a stretch.
> >>
> >> Message ends.
> >>
> >
> > Why do you use {C}Python in the first place if its so inefficient?
> > Why not use C or even Assembly?
> >
> > And "coming soon" - is a little weird.
> > Why not say "coming 10 May 2021 at 23:59:59"?
> >
> > /Message ends.
> >
> > Thank you.
>
> But I don't use Python, I use C++ (probably the best programming language
> in the
> world).
>
Posting in the python community implies that you are using {c}python.
Otherwise you will not be posting here.
And definitely would be waiting until you can show the "best python
implementation ever".
And C++ is also bad - Assembly is so much better and so much more efficient.
/Message ends.
Thank you.
> /Flibble
>
> --
> 😎
> --
> https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
