Hi, On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 11:27 AM Mr Flibble < flib...@i42.invalidwibblegrok.co.uk> wrote:
> On 05/05/2021 17:02, Chris Angelico wrote: > > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 2:01 AM Mr Flibble > > <flib...@i42.invalidwibblegrok.co.uk> wrote: > >> > >> neoPython : Fastest Python Implementation: Coming Soon > >> > >> Message ends. > >> > >> /Flibble > >> > > > > My breath: not being held. > > > > Message ends. > > Why? The currently extant Python implementations are so inefficient they > contribute to climate change; CPython is particularly egregious. Making a > faster > implementation isn't in the least bit a stretch. > > Message ends. > Why do you use {C}Python in the first place if its so inefficient? Why not use C or even Assembly? And "coming soon" - is a little weird. Why not say "coming 10 May 2021 at 23:59:59"? /Message ends. Thank you. > /Flibble > > -- > 😎 > -- > https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list > -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list