On 05/05/2021 17:36, Igor Korot wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 11:27 AM Mr Flibble <
flib...@i42.invalidwibblegrok.co.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2021 17:02, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 2:01 AM Mr Flibble
<flib...@i42.invalidwibblegrok.co.uk> wrote:
neoPython : Fastest Python Implementation: Coming Soon
Message ends.
/Flibble
My breath: not being held.
Message ends.
Why? The currently extant Python implementations are so inefficient they
contribute to climate change; CPython is particularly egregious. Making a
faster
implementation isn't in the least bit a stretch.
Message ends.
Why do you use {C}Python in the first place if its so inefficient?
Why not use C or even Assembly?
And "coming soon" - is a little weird.
Why not say "coming 10 May 2021 at 23:59:59"?
/Message ends.
Thank you.
But I don't use Python, I use C++ (probably the best programming language in the
world).
/Flibble
--
😎
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
