On 17/06/2015 02:01, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:36 AM, <sohcahto...@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, we all know what the gambler's fallacy is, but that's not what anyone is
arguing.
The only instance of gambler's fallacy I'm seeing here is "PointedEars
didn't understand the last dozen emails, so he's due to understand the
next one". I've given up trying to explain.
ChrisA
An alternative explanation is that he's just a plain, old fashioned
troll, as pointed out by Denis McMahon some weeks ago. Now what is the
probability of that? :)
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
