On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 10:36 AM, <sohcahto...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, we all know what the gambler's fallacy is, but that's not what anyone is > arguing.
The only instance of gambler's fallacy I'm seeing here is "PointedEars didn't understand the last dozen emails, so he's due to understand the next one". I've given up trying to explain. ChrisA -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
