Chris Angelico wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Steven D'Aprano > <steve+comp.lang.pyt...@pearwood.info> wrote: >> I consider return type to be part of the function signature. The >> signature of a function is the parameters it accepts and the result it >> returns. > > It is, but there are times when it isn't significant. For instance, > C++ overloaded functions are distinguished by their function > signatures, but *not* including the return values (nor several other > aspects).
C++ is an unholy abomination unto Nuggan :-) -- Steve -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
