In article <mailman.18185.1422391238.18130.python-l...@python.org>, ros...@gmail.com says... > > On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:59 AM, Mario Figueiredo <mar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > An optional feature says nothing of its requirements. The requirements > > for PEP 484 are heavy. Not only will they force an update to the > > interpreter, but will also force many users to reformate their function > > headers in order for them to become bareable to the eye. In fact, no > > longer will you look at function definitions like you did before. > > What updates are needed to the interpreter? > > https://www.python.org/dev/peps/pep-3107/ > > Already happened, long ago.
I wasn't aware the interpreter was already able to parse PEP 484. Thank you. Strike that phrase of that paragraph. But what a royal mess! Looking at PEP 3107, i'm left wondering: what if I have for instance already annotated my functions for parameter marshalling, following the syntax expected of that specific library, and now I want to annotate them for type hinting for the purposes of static analysis? -- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
