On 05/12/2013 16:20, Chris Angelico wrote:
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 2:32 AM, Travis Griggs <travisgri...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Dec 5, 2013, at 2:56 AM, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
3. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/python-virtualenv may be a better
place to ask
Am I the only one that sees the irony in this suggestion? Given the long
running tirades^H^H^H^H^H^H thread about “Managing Google Groups headaches”?
“Pleassse don’t use Google Groupssssesss. It’sss nasssty. It hurtssess our
eyesssessss with itsss long linessssieesss. Unlessssss it hassss a ssspecial
neeeeed. Then the groupssesss are OK, Yessss?"
No, it's not like that. It's that there are some people who, despite
truckloads of evidence to the contrary, still think that Google Groups
is worth using. Rusi is one of them. Fortunately, he has defended his
position by making his posts not look like the ridiculous junk that GG
creates by default, but that doesn't make GG a good product. It's like
an argument my boss and I had: I said that PHP is a bad language, and
he said that it can't possibly be a bad language because he's able to
write good code in it.
I don't know what mailing list there is for virtualenv as I don't use
it, but there's likely to be an alternative source of knowledge on it.
ChrisA
gmane.comp.python.virtualenv
--
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.
Mark Lawrence
--
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
