On 26 October 2013 07:36, Mark Lawrence <breamore...@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> I can't see it being a bot on the grounds that a bot wouldn't be smart > enough to snip a URL that referred to itself as a quack. > My thought based on some of the responses is that they seem auto-generated, then tweaked - so not a bot per-se, but verging on it. But OTOH, it can also be explained away entirely by (as you previously noted) the Dunning-Kruger effect, with the same uninformed responses trotted out to everything. Not necessarily a troll as I injudiciously claimed in my previous post (I'd just woken up after 4 hours sleep - my apologies to the list). Anyway, not going to get sucked into this bottomless hole. Tim Delaney
-- https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
