Matt Joiner wrote:
> +0.5
>
> The "trailing \" workaround is nonobvious. Wrapping in () is noisy and
> already heavily used by other syntactical structures.
"Noisy"? Compare:
# Best viewed with a fixed-width font
if a if (a
and b and b
or c: or c):
do stuff() do stuff()
That is not my idea of "noise". The brackets have a clear and obvious
meaning: they group the condition.
> Since a final
> ':' is needed anyway, i think this would be great.
A final : is not needed for arbitrary expressions.
flag = (a
and b
or c)
--
Steven
--
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
