On 2010-11-05, Nobody <nob...@nowhere.com> wrote: > However, it's still written for language lawyers.
> IMHO, the lack of a reference manual for the language itself is a major > hole in Python's documentation. I'm a bit lost here. Could you highlight some of the differences between "a reference manual for the language itself" and "something written for language lawyers"? -s -- Copyright 2010, all wrongs reversed. Peter Seebach / usenet-nos...@seebs.net http://www.seebs.net/log/ <-- lawsuits, religion, and funny pictures http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fair_Game_(Scientology) <-- get educated! I am not speaking for my employer, although they do rent some of my opinions. -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
