In <7xpr7lixnn....@ruckus.brouhaha.com> Paul Rubin <http://phr...@nospam.invalid> writes:
>It seems a little weird to me that they (Google) are concerned with >the speed of the compiler, indicating that they plan to write enormous >programs in the language. Fast compilation also means that Go can conceivably become an attractive alternative to interpreted languages, because the compilation stage can be made as unobtrusive as, say, Python's byte-compilation stage (except that the Go compiler is generating native code). I believe that OCaml already offers a way to run code via such on-the-fly compilation, but I doubt that OCaml's compilers are as fast as Go's. kynn -- http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
